18 Monday Apr 2011
On April 13, 2011, The Maryland Zoo in Baltimore announced the birth of an Endangered Coquerel’s Sifaka (Propithecus coquereli) making it one of only 50 individuals found in accredited institutions in the United States.
Coquerel-Sifaka at the Maryland Zoo in Baltimore, Photo: Kristin Abt
Read the press release for more information!
The Duke Lemur Center manages the United States’ Coquerel’s Sifaka population and provides more information about the species: Coquerel’s Sifaka
01 Friday Apr 2011
By: Kristin Abt
A recent article in the journal, Zoo Biology, discusses the current lack of gum enrichment for certain primate species in a captive setting that is in contrast to their wild behavior. Huber and Lewis (2011) surveyed zoos at an international scale to assess the occurrence and methods of “gum-based enrichment.”
Patas Monkey at Woodland Park Zoo (Photo: Kristin Abt)
Golden Lion Tamarin at National Zoo (Photo: Kristin Abt)
They identify numerous primates that feed on gums in varying amounts in the wild, including galagos and lorises, marmosets and tamarins, and members of Cercopithecinae. Because enrichment aims to promote species-typical behaviors in a non-natural environment, the items that are offered should be primarily selected based on whether or not they contribute to this aim.
This study obtained responses from 46 zoos, 27 of which feed gum to at least some of their primates. The greatest disparity between wild gum-feeding and captive gum-provisioning was for cercopithecines. They identify patas monkeys as obligate gumnivores; therefore, they specifically highlight the need for the development of enrichment programs utilizing gum for this species. Also, they highlight the need to provide enrichment devices that simulate how primates feed on gum in the wild as opposed to free-feeding in dishes.
Patas Monkey Exhibit (Photo: Kristin Abt)
Huber and Lewis (2011) take a focused approach to assessing an area of enrichment within zoos that can have a marked management impact. This study shows the value of applied research to enhance the ability of zoos and other facilities to care for their collections in a manner more representative of the wild experience.
Reference:
Huber, H. F. & Lewis, K. P. (2011). “An assessment of gum-based environmental enrichment for captive gumnivorous primates.” Zoo Biology 30: 71-78.
29 Tuesday Mar 2011
Posted in Blog
Long-tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis) were able to succeed when faced with a basic numerical test, discovers a team of researchers at the German Primate Center, Goettingen. Researchers Vanessa Schmidt and Julia Fischer developed a basic test where an individual was presented with two plates, each containing a different quantity of pebbles, and where the plate with the largest number of pebbles gave a greater reward. The macaques were able to understand the concept of relative quantities, and choose the correct option at 80%+ success rate.
Although experimentation testing these types of numerical skills are not new, previous studies used edible items where the subject may eat the amount of food on the plate in which they choose – this experiment yielded only a 69% success rate in this study, and showed that the impulsiveness to gain a reward that they could see impaired their judgement when making a choice. Therefore previous studies may have underestimated the animals’ ability.
More information at; BBC – Earth News
Schmitt, V. & Fischer, J. Representational format determines numerical competence in monkeys. (2011). Nat. Commun. 2:257 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1262.
16 Wednesday Mar 2011
Posted in Blog
Last week, I blogged about the semantics of alarm calls in vervet monkeys. This post will focus solely on the ingenious experiment by Robert Seyfarth, Dorothy Cheney and Peter Marler (1980) to test whether vervet monkey alarm calls convey information or if these calls were just an uncontrollable auditory response to predators. Their question was simple; would vervet monkey alarm calls alone elicit different responses?
A vervet monkey. Photo from Wikipedia.
Here’s what the researchers did in the field. They used playbacks of recorded vervet monkey (subjects) alarm calls from concealed speakers. Equal amount of alarm calls for leopard, eagle and snake were used. These alarm calls were recorded from known adult male, adult female and juvenile vervet monkeys in the field. Trials were done when subjects were on the ground and also when they were in the trees. These trials were conducted in the absence of predators to eliminate visual cues from the caller.
Alarm calls were broadcasted in different amplitudes to mimic natural alarm calls. In succession from loudest to lowest amplitudes are alarm calls for leopard, eagle and snake. Subsequently, leopard calls have the lowest pitch while snake calls have the highest pitch. To control for the possible effects of amplitude, the researchers broadcasted alarm calls that do not differ significantly in the amplitudes for all three predators.
Table from Seyfarth et al. (1980). Click on illustration for its original size
The alarm call playbacks showed two types of responses. First, subjects of any sex and age looked at the direction of the speaker and spent more time scanning their environment once an alarm call was made for more than 10 seconds. The researchers believe that they might be scanning for additional cues from the “caller” and the subject’s surrounding.
Second, each alarm calls seem to elicit a distinct response from the subjects. Remember the trials were done when the subjects were on the ground and on the trees? When subjects were on ground, leopard calls were more likely to make them run up into the trees and eagle calls made them look up and run into cover (bushes) Snake calls made them look down. When subjects were on the trees, leopard calls were more likely to make them run higher in trees and to look down. Eagle calls made them look up and sometimes run out of trees. Snake calls made them look down.
From the results, Seyfarth et al. (1980) posit that vervet monkey alarm calls alone do elicit different responses. It’s hard to tease out whether these alarm calls symbolize the predator ”leopard” or a command ”run up tree”. However, we can postulate that these alarm calls are rudimentary semantic signals used to warn other conspecific of impending danger. For those that are not familiar with semantics, it refers to the meaning of a symbol, sign, word or phrase. In this case, vervet monkey alarm calls are semantic signals because it conveys a specific meaning.
Reference:
Seyfarth, RM. Cheney, DL. Marler, P. 1980. Monkey responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence of Predator Classification and Semantic Communication. Science 210(4471): 801-803.
Originally posted on The Prancing Papio.
09 Wednesday Mar 2011
Posted in Blog
Anti-predatory alarm calls are important for social animals to alert others of approaching predators. Without the presence of “language”, some non-human primates are known to give out different predator-specific alarm calls to alert conspecific. These non-human primates include ring-tailed lemurs (Zuberbühler et al., 1999), white-faced capuchin monkeys (Fichtel et al., 2005), Diana monkeys (Zuberbühler, 1999), Campbell’s monkeys (Ouattara et al., 2009) and vervet monkeys (Seyfarth et al., 1980).
Alarm calls are typically high frequency sounds because these calls are hard to localized by predators. On the other hand, low frequency sounds are easier to localized by predators. Calls that are hard to localized by predators are selected for because conspecific can pick up on the warning but predators cannot identify the location of the caller. If an individual successfully alert its social group of approaching predator yet does not reveal its location, it will significantly decrease the chance of the caller to be detected and increase the chance of its social group to avoid predation.
Here, I will focus on the study of predatory alarm calls in vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) by Seyfarth et al. (1980) in the Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Vervet monkeys are Old World monkeys that range between Eastern and Southern Africa. These monkeys are diurnal and live in closely-knit social groups. They are quadrupedal and are both terrestrial and arboreal. Like all Old World monkeys, vervet monkeys have the characteristic cheek pouches that enables them to forage and store food to be eaten later. Male vervet monkeys have blue scrotal area and a red penis. Males and females are sexually dimorphic, with males slightly larger than females.
Vervet monkeys are known to elicit predator-specific alarm calls. Three well-documented vervet monkey alarm calls are those for leopard, martial eagle and python. Leopard alarm calls are short tonal calls produced in a series of inhalations and exhalations. Eagle alarm calls are low pitched grunt while python alarm calls are high pitched “chutters”. Different alarm calls seem to evoke different responses to individuals that heard the alarm calls. However, the first reaction of a vervet monkey upon hearing an alarm call is to look at the direction of the caller. Looking at the direction of the caller gives them clues as to why the alarm calls were made and also where the caller is facing reveals the direction of the approaching predator. You can listen to these different alarm calls on this site.
As we said before, different alarm calls evoke different responses. Leopard alarm calls would make the monkeys run up into the tree to avoid being ambushed by the leopard. Also, these monkeys would sit on the branches further away from the tree because, even though leopards can climb trees, the branches could not support the leopard’s weight. When an eagle alarm call is given, vervet monkeys would make them look up, run for the nearest bush or both to avoid an approaching aerial attack. Python alarm calls would the monkeys stand bipedally and look down on the ground.
Adult vervet monkeys are more discriminatory when eliciting alarm calls. Infants and juveniles calls however, are less discriminating as they attribute most terrestrial mammals with leopard calls, flying birds with eagle calls and stick-like figures with snake calls (although, compared to infants, juveniles are more discriminant when making alarm calls). In spite of that, adult vervet monkeys seem to elicit eagle alarm calls to different species of raptors and non-raptors (see illustration below). We can infer that adult vervet monkeys attribute eagle alarm calls to birds with the same silhouette as martial eagles. As vervet monkeys get older, they seem to have a better association between predator species and types of alarm calls. Vervet monkeys generally pay more attention to adult alarm calls than those of juveniles or infants.
The study of vervet monkey alarm calls by Seyfarth et al. (1980) laid an important ground work to better understand the complexity of animal communications. By showing that vervet monkeys make different alarm calls to different predatory species, we can posit that vervet monkeys have the ability to categorize different species. The ability to discriminate between terrestrial mammal, flying birds and snake-like objects starts during infancy in vervet monkeys. As they get older, they are better at associating predators with specific alarm calls.
The ability to over generalize during infancy is evident in both vervet monkeys and humans. For example, upon learning the word “dog”, human infants would refer to quadruped mammals they see as “dog”. As the infant grows, so does the ability to associate the semantic meaning of words they learned. However, the acquisition of alarm calls in vervet monkeys is different than the acquisition of speech (language) in humans. Alarm calls in vervet monkeys are instinctual and not learned. Humans, however, have to learn their language. Failing to do so during the “critical period” generally will result in the inability to learn language in later years. Feral child are examples of human infants that lack linguistic input during their critical period of language acquisition.
Most of us interpret animal alarm calls as an uncontrollable auditory response to fear or pain, akin to humans yelping if we had our finger caught in a door. While this is not entirely false, some animal calls actually convey information from the caller to the listener. Seyfarth et al. (1980) posit that vervet monkey alarm calls are actually basic semantic signals or symbolic signals because each alarm calls seem to mean something to these vervet monkeys. While we don’t know if these alarm calls actually mean “leopard” or “run up to the tree”, we do know that it conveys specific information to their conspecific about approaching predators.
I will be blogging Part II of this post later this week, where I will explain in details the experiments done by Seyfarth and Cheney on vervet monkey alarm calls.
References:
Cawthon Lang KA. 2006 January 3. Primate Factsheets: Vervet (Chlorocebus) Taxonomy, Morphology, & Ecology. http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/vervet. Accessed 2011 March 9.
Fichtel, C. Perry, S. Gros-Louis, J. 2005. Alarm calls of white-faced capuchin monkeys: an acoustic analysis. Animal Behaviour 70(1): 165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.09.020.
Gould, JL. Gould, CG. 1999. The Animal Mind. Scientific American Library.
Ouattara, K. Lemasson, A. Zuberbühler, K. 2009. Campbell’s Monkeys Use Affixation to Alter Call Meaning. PLoS ONE 4(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007808.
Seyfarth, RM. Cheney, DL. Marler, P. 1980. Monkey responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence of Predator Classification and Semantic Communication. Science 210(4471): 801-803.
Zuberbühler, K. Jenny, D. Bshary, R. 1999. The Predator Deterrence Function of Primate Alarm Calls. Ethology 105: 477–490. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00396.x.
Zuberbuhler, K. 2000. Referential labelling in Diana monkeys. Animal Behaviour 59(5): 917-927. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1317.
05 Saturday Mar 2011
Posted in Blog
Sodhi, N. S. and P. R. Ehrlich (Eds.). 2010. Conservation Biology for All. Oxford University Press.
Available online at: http://www.mongabay.com/conservation-biology-for-all.html
“The authors published Conservation Biology for All in a free and open access format in an effort to make conservation knowledge available to as many people as possible.”
25 Friday Feb 2011
Tags
Born to Be Wild, conservation, great apes, Orangutan Foundation International, orangutans, Rehabilitation
Orangutan at Sepilok (Photo: Kristin Abt)
A recent article “Fostering Appropriate Behavior in Rehabilitant Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus)” published online in the International Journal of Primatology discusses research on the behavior of rehabilitant orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and P. abelii) at the Orangutan Care and Quarantine Centre in Pangkalan Bun, Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo). Much past research has focused on postrelease behavior of rehabilitated orangutans and on the behavior of wild individuals; therefore, this research is especially timely and useful for the number of centers currently attempting to rehabilitate the ever-increasing number of displaced great apes and other fauna (Descovich et al., 2011).
Orangutans (n=40) in this study included males and females, mass classes ranging from 5 to 25 kg, and good, moderate, and poor health distinctions. Individuals were observed continuously for a period of 5 hours during 3 separate forest excursions each. A number of behaviors relevant to postrelease success in the forest habitat were recorded (type of locomotion, social behavior, such as play, human caretaker interaction, point of height in tree or on ground, feeding and food choice, grooming, etc.).
Results from this study showed that rehabilitant individuals’ masses were associated with the amount of time spent at the centre. Authors note this finding as a result of the early age of admittance to the centre for most individuals. Further, orangutans in better health spent an increased amount of time consuming food and less time resting than other categories. In terms of locomotion (>30% of overall time), quadrupedal movement in trees was the dominant method (again, with orangutans in better health doing so more often). Individuals who had been at the Care Centre longer spent more time on the ground rather than swinging or other locomotion. As the day in which focal individuals were observed continued, human interaction increased.
As rehabilitation of orphaned individuals is a component of the long-term species survival of orangutans, research regarding the behavior of these individuals is important for increasing the chance of postrelease survival and success. Additionally, as their habitat is lost as a result of a number of conservation threats, land protection is necessary to provide habitat in which the released individuals and their wild conspecifics can live.
Reference
Descovich, K. A., Galdikas, B. M., Tribe, A., Lisle, A., & Phillips, C. J. 2011. Fostering appropriate behavior in rehabilitant orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). International Journal of Primatology. doi:10.1007/s10764-011-9491-1
Orangutan Foundation International (a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization) supports the work of the Orangutan Care and Quarantine Centre and other crucial efforts to promote orangutan conservation, including land protection, research, and education. Visit www.orangutan.org to donate directly to OFI. If you would like to donate items specifically to enhance the lives of individuals at the Care Centre, visit this wishlist to select items that orangutans, such as those in this study, will greatly benefit from. If you would like to learn more, look for the upcoming IMAX© movie Born to Be Wild to be released in theaters April 8, 2011.
21 Monday Feb 2011
When trained Macaques were given a choice of three answers in a computer game; one of which was correct, one incorrect, and an additional option to pass – macaques where shown to choose the latter option to pass rather than risk being incorrect. The macaques were rewarded for a correct answer, but an incorrect answer initiated a pause in the game until the next question.
The “pass“ option was used in an identical fashion to that of human participants, and the macaques were observed to show self-doubting behaviour – a trait which was previously thought to be unique to us. When capuchins were faced with an identical challenge, they failed to take this third option, and seemed unaware when they are likely to make an error.
More information and Video at; BBC – Earth News
16 Wednesday Feb 2011
Last October, London Zoo saw the birth of a new baby gorilla? He has since been named Tiny and he’s walking now.
London Zoo's Tiny
12 Saturday Feb 2011
Sexual competition can be highly disruptive of group relationships, especially if conflicts are escalated into a fight – so it is important for third-parties to “keep track” of consortship partners within a group in order to take appropriate action and possibly avoid such confrontations. De Marco et al. collected data from 2 Tonkean Macaque groups, to test whether attention from third-parties would be directed towards actively consorting group-mates and to then see if activities are modified, or if stress levels increase.
They found that the dominant male was approached more frequently when involved in a partnership with an estrous female. But also found that although females gain more attention during estrous, levels of interactions with the female during consortship did not change comparatively to the control. De Marco et al. also found that levels of sleeping and environment manipulation from bystanders were significantly reduced during times of sexual pairing; this study is the first to demonstrate a change of group behaviour in primates during times of sexual consortship.
Read more of the study at;
De Marco, A. Cozzolino, R. Dessì-Fulgheri, F. Thierry, B. 2011. Interactions between Third Parties and Consortship Partners in Tonkean Macaques (Macaca tonkeana). Int J Primatol DOI: 10.1007/s10764-011-9496-9
